Introduction
The Grid
Oriented Hydraulic Fracture Extension Replicator is a planar 3-D geometry
and fluid/solid transport simulator. The model relies heavily upon log-derived
input data. Rock elastic properties, porosity and lithology can be input
directly from standard log ASCII (LAS) files. This data along with pore
fluid gradients, regions of overpressure or depletion, and tectonic
offsets are used to constrain in-situ stress profiles. Effects of poroelasticity
are considered in the calculation of closure stress.
The model
has been used extensively in many regions including soft-sediment frac-packing,
hard rock/tight gas environments, naturally fractured reservoirs, moderate
perm oil sands, and for acid-frac design in carbonates. The formulation
can be applied in all these areas without special "tuning" or incorporation
of different assumptions. Major features of the model are described
in the following brief sections. An example is presented to illustrate
the model's utility.
Model
Features
Data
Input: The Grid Oriented Hydraulic
Fracture Extension Replicator is based on a grid structure. The grid
is mapped onto the surface of the created fracture and is therefore
not necessarily planar in real-space. State variables, such as pressure,
width, shear rate, fluid age, leakoff rate, prop concentration, velocity,
fluid composition, proppant composition, etc., are defined at each grid
cell. Similarly, input data such as rock elastic properties, pore fluid
pressures, stresses, and reservoir properties, must be assigned at each
cell location. This allows for both vertical and lateral variations
in properties. Vertical variations can be described by well logs but
lateral variations require additional knowledge of local geology and
structure that can be obtained from 2-D and 3-D seismic or crosswell
imaging. To take full advantage of the capability to model lateral variations,
the model can be run in either "symmetric" or "asymmetric" modes. In
the asymmetric mode both wings of the fracture are modeled so the effects
of lateral pressure gradients, bed dip, and changes in rock properties
can be modeled. This mode is also useful for modeling simultaneous multiple
fractures initiated from a horizontal wellbore.
The program
is structured to utilise all available well log data. Standard log ASCII
format (LAS) files can be input to the Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture
Extension Replicator and any data contained in the log tracks can be
directly imported to the model an a foot-by-foot basis. Data is averaged
over the specified node size.
For history
matching, job data recorded on site can be used to re-create the actual
pumping schedule used in the job. An input module automatically filters
the actual job data and records any changes in pump rate or proppant
concentration. The data is then converted to a rate schedule that can
be directly imported into Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture Extension
Replicator.
Fluid
Rheology: Fluid rheology is described using
a time-dependent Carreau rheology model that describes the low-shear
Newtonian plateau, power-law, and high-shear plateau regions. Fluid
break and thermal degradation is modeled using a complex model that
has been validated against extensive laboratory measurements. Effects
of solids addition on fluid rheology are also modeled.
Inputs
to the model describe the initial (zero-time) characteristics of the
fluid. These include n', k', the zero-shear viscosity (Newtonian plateau)
and the solvent viscosity. The break profile, whether caused by spontaneous
degradation at temperature or chemical breakers, is described by an
additional eight parameters. These control the induction time for the
onset of changes in n', k', and zero-shear viscosity, the exponential
rate of break of each parameter after the induction time, and the maximum
value of n' achieved and the minimum value of zero-shear viscosity reached
(in case of an incomplete break).
Within
the model, the age of the fluid in each cell is computed, along with
the local shear conditions, and the volume fraction of each fluid present
in the cell. At each cell and at each time-step the effective viscosity
is determined from the time/shear dependent rheology, composition and
solids loading of the fluid. It has been observed that local variations
in fluid mobility have a significant effect on pressure and velocity
distribution in the fracture, hence on ultimate frac geometry and proppant
placement. For this reason the direct coupling between rheology and
geometry is critical.
Fluid
Loss: Fluid loss is described by an extension of the classical
Howard-Fast or Carter leakoff model. Effects of the compressible region,
viscous-invaded zone and filter cake are modeled. The formulation also
handles the invasion of non-Newtonian whole gel prior to filter-cake
deposition. Permeability, local shear, fluid age, filtration pressure,
and other factors automatically scale spurt volume and leakoff coefficients.
Filter cake erosion and equilibrium leakoff are also modeled.
Inputs
to the model include spurt volume, wall building coefficients, equilibrium
leakoff coefficient, filter cake compressibility, rel-perm and fluid
damage factors, permeability, porosity, pore pressure, and local frac
fluid pressure, viscosity and shear rate. The leakoff parameters are
input under standard conditions of permeability, porosity, and filtration
pressure. They are automatically scaled to the input permeability, porosity,
and local conditions at each grid cell at each time. In this kind of
model the idea of a single constant leakoff coefficient is in-appropriate
since leakoff varies continuously, both spatially and temporally.
The model
handles the effect of changing injected fluid since each fluid has its
own array or leakoff parameters. As the bulk fluid composition in each
node changes with time, the leakoff parameters are varied with the composition.
The model clearly shows that changing from water or linear pad to crosslinked
fluid (or vice-versa) can significantly change leakoff behavior and
fracture geometry.
Pressure
Dependent Leakoff: Pres-sure dependent leakoff caused by
dilation of natural fissures is modeled. Field diagnostics have been
developed to determine the critical fissure opening pressure and pressure
dependent leakoff coefficient for input to the model.
Each cell
in the model has an assigned minimum in-situ stress. The critical fissure
opening pressure is handled by inputting a stress anisotropy offset
for each cell. This offset defines the net pressure (above local closure)
required to begin dilating existing natural fractures or pre-existing
planes of weakness.
Each
cell is also assigned a pressure dependent leakoff factor that controls
the rate of increase of leakoff as a function of pressure above the
critical fissure opening pressure. In many cases the observed leakoff
can be many times higher than the matrix-dominated leakoff observed
during pressure falloff at the end of a job.
Changes
in apparent modulus or stiffness are also handled by an input pressure
dependent modulus coefficient. Changes in modulus, either stiffening
or softening are assumed to occur at the same critical pressure as pressure
dependent leakoff.
Fluid/Solid
Transport: Fluid and solid transport
are computed using an implicitly coupled finite-difference model. The
local fluid age, solids loading, shear rate, and fluid composition determine
fluid mobility at each grid cell and are updated at each time-step (typically
1-5 seconds) throughout the simulation. The total potential field, including
both the induced pressure gradient and density-driven flow drives flow.
Fluid velocity controls local shear rate which in-turn controls fluid
mobility. Hence local variations in fluid properties or flow conditions
feedback to control future fluid and solid movement. Significant control
of fracture geometry and proppant placement can be achieved by varying
fluid properties.
Direct
modeling of slurry transport in a 4 foot by 16 foot long slot has validated
the solids transport model by 16-foot long slot model. These physical
model studies have shown the importance of the Carreau rheology model
instead of the traditional power-law approximation. The studies have
also shown that the formulation used, which is equivalent to that used
in most reservoir simulators, adequately describes most slurry flow
phenomena. One factor, which is still being investigated, is the re-suspension
transport of sand by low viscosity fluids.
In-Situ
Stress Calculation: Rather than entering an assumed stress
profile, the Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture Extension Replicator uses
data from identifiable sources and applies consistent boundary conditions
to determine stress profiles. Poisson's ratio and Young's Modulus are
input manually or from log (LAS) files, and assigned to each grid cell.
All properties can vary both vertically and laterally. Asymmetric fracture
growth can easily be modeled.
Pore fluid
gradients must be entered for each cell, along with pore pressure offsets
to account for local regions of overpressure of depletion. Total pore
pressure in each cell is calculated from the fluid gradients, grid cell
datum elevations and pressure offsets. The resulting pore pressure is
used, along with vertical and horizontal Biot's poroelastic constants,
to determine stress resulting from uni-axial strain loading of the overburden
sediment. The effective overburden gradient can be specified. It has
been found, both through field observations and in laboratory measurements,
that Biot's constant is not 1.0 (as is commonly assumed) for many formations.
In moderately to well consolidated formations, values as low as 0.45
have been measured. This is an input parameter that can significantly
affect computed stress that is commonly ignored but should be rigorously
determined.
Since stress
in most areas does not conform to the quiescent assumptions of the uni-axial
strain model, regional tectonic strains are input. Experience with the
model has shown that a constant strain boundary condition is more representative
of "real-world" conditions than a constant stress offset. When considering
a vertical interval of a few hundred feet it is more reasonable to assume
that the vertical bed stack has been subjected to approximately constant
strain, rather than constant lateral stress. In that case each bed will
develop a different lateral stress related to its stiffness and the
applied strain. High modulus layers will develop appreciable more stress
than soft sediment layers. Total closure pressure is therefore a function
of pore pressure, poroelasticity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus.
Width
Solution: Originally the Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture
Extension Replicator used as an exact numerical solution of the complete
surface integral formulation for the displacement of a semi-infinite
half space proposed by Boussinesq. The solution assumed that the entire
rock mass behaved as a linear-elastic closely coupled medium. This formulation
resulted in large fracture widths and large stress concentrations at
the fracture tips, leading to lack of height containment.
Observations
of real jobs, based on treating pressures, production performance, tracer
surveys, tiltmeter and micro-seismic mapping, all suggest that fractures
grow very rapidly in length and are better contained than the elastically
coupled model predicts. The assumption of complete elastic coupling
throughout the entire rock mass is not representative of most formations.
The lack of coupling is illustrated buy the existence of micro-seismic
events caused shear failures in the deformed rock mass around the fracture.
To approximate a shear de-coupled displacement solution the area of
applied load integrated in the width solution was truncated to an input
"shear dampening radius". This formulation results in improved height
containment and a better representation of field observations.
Data
Output: Because the Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture Extension
Replicator provides state variables at each node at each time-step,
there is a huge amount of output data to be processed. Along with typical
time-vector plots of surface and bottom-hole treating pressure, injected
rate, fluid efficiency, surface and bottom-hole prop concentration,
Grid Oriented Hydraulic Fracture Extension Replicator also produces
a time- lapse map of the fracture surface showing many of the tracked
state variables.
By "re-playing"
the time-lapse image the user can display any chosen variable over the
surface of the fracture and watch its variation through time. Output
variables include fluid pressure, net pressure, width, proppant volume
fraction of up to ten prop types, proppant concentration, leak off rate,
fracture and porous medium shear rates, fluid age, viscosity, injection
rate and pressure drop through each set of perforations, and velocity
in X and Z directions. For acid fracturing the model also outputs maps
of surface and bulk concentration of all reactive species and products,
along with the etched fracture width.
When history
matching observed pressures, the model results can be plotted over the
observed pressures while the model is running. This capability also
provides real-time plotting for use at the job site. The program has
real-time serial communication protocols to acquire data from the frac
van and can plot it with the model results during the job.
The author
is with Barree and Associates